#IDFABijlmerParktheater – panel 1
Dear (potential) visitors of the first #IDFABijlmerParktheater panel,
We have 45 minutes for our conversation about social justice and social media. This might not seem like a long time but, when used properly, it’s enough to break down some of the things we need to “forever and consistently be broke”.
Our talk will centre around:
1. The experiences and realities of Black and Brown people who’re based in the Netherlands.
2. Names, labels and identity politics.
3. Racism in Dutch media.
4. Selective solidarity/ our collective and individual responses to tragedies.
And yes, if you’re panicking because none of your Euro-oriented academic studies prepared you for the use of the term Helper Whitey, this one is for you.
But 45 minutes is 45 minutes is 45 minutes. To make sure that we’re not losing precious time and/or scarce patience, we won’t make time to deal with/answer any of the following questions and statements:
1. “Why aren’t you addressing reversed racism? When can we have an honest conversation about Black people being racist against White people?”
2. “If a platform like De Correspondent specifically look for non-white writers, isn’t that racist toward white writers?”
3. “If people stopped talking about race there would be no racism.”
4. “How can there ever be unity if people talk about Black Lives Matter? ALL Lives Matter!”
5. “Could it be that the writer of [insert title of racist article here] actually had the intention to [insert something about satire here]?”
6. “Doesn’t [insert racial slur here] have a different context in the Netherlands?”
7. “If, by judging by all the points you just made, I’m racist… what can I do to be less racist?”
8. “Shouldn’t we just leave all of this behind us, get over it and move on? If you work hard enough, racism won’t face you?”
9. “Are you angry? You look/sound/act angry…”
All of the questions above have already been answered in a plethora of essays, columns and/or articles about these matters. On Youtube and in other digital archives you’ll also find recordings of panel discussions and interviews that deal with them. We’re too exhausted to repeat ourselves. We have no interest in squeezing our answers to these questions into an elevator pitch so that those who’re not yet sure if our well-being deserves their time, can spend more time validating us and less time educating themselves. We believe that there has been enough time to not know, to have never heard it before, to not be able to imagine, to think it’s not that serious, etc.
None of us are here to stand still.
Peace,
The panellists of panel #1 (Mariam El Maslouhi, Ramona Sno, Abdirashid Suleiman and Simone Zeefuik)
#DecolonizeDutchMedia – Dutch newspaper wonders “Nigger are you crazy?”
On July 31, Dutch newspaper NRC published a review of Ta-Nehisi Coates’ Between The World and Me. With its title, the piece written by Guus Valk asks: Nigger are you crazy? How do you destroy the black identity? This comes only days after the paper published a column entitled Black America needs to look at itself in which Black Americans were told to “stop impregnating 16 year old girls because your grandmother sat in the back of the bus.” Since NRC is so eager to weigh in on what Black people should do, it’s only right to provide translations so we can drag them from the bench to the field.
Aside from the racist title, the piece which also discusses Paul Beatty’s The Sellout and Mat Johnson’s Loving Day, is adorned with this illustration (pic) by Aron Vellekoop León who captured Blackness as Dutch, mainstream whiteness likes to see it: colonial, submissive, sad and with a dash of blackface. When one of the sharpest Twitterati in the Dutch conversations about racism confronted Valk with the title, he stated that he merely writes the reviews but doesn’t pick the titles, intro’s and illustrations. He didn’t object to the use of the word nigger or the disgusting illustration. If that wasn’t a co-sign, it was at least a shrug.
Valk needs less than two sentences to illustrate how little he understands about racism. “The issue of race was assumed to be settled with Obama as president. Since the Summer of 2014 it became clear that this is absolutely false.” Imagine the uneducated white privilege that produces the illusion that in the evening of November 4 2008, racism was put on hold and that nothing racist happened until the white officer Darren Wilson killed the Black teenager Michael Brown.
With every single sentence, Valk drags himself further and further from the understanding that his analyses about racism are only as valuable as the silence that fails to smother them. He states: “A few years America, especially [white] America, lived in a dream. A new era had arrived, in which old problematic race relations didn’t matter anymore. The inauguration of president Barack Obama, the first black president, underlined that America has entered a post-racial era. Of course there are still differences between [white] and black but they’re more the result of social class than of race.” I write white in brackets because, to the vast majority of Dutch people being called white… well, those are fighting words. The Dutch prefer ‘blank’, a term that has no non-Dutch equivalent but means “bright white, without stains, without color”. It can be used for people but also for varnish or a yoghurt like dairy product called vla. If it sounds familiar, 
that’s probably because you’ve seen it on the signs from South Africa’s official apartheid era.
Then there’s also the term Black which is written with a lower case ‘b’ because the idea of Black with a captial B, combining political identities with African and/or Afrodiasporic heritages, has yet to enter mainstream Dutch media. How serious can we take someone who wonders “How do you articulate racism” but is still too much of a coward to rid his work of the comfort that the word ‘blank’ continues to provide? With his “The debate about race is dead serious, especially from the [white] perspective” he affirmed that he has absolutely no idea what he read or what he’s writing.
“Do we truly expect something different from a white privileged son of the Netherlands’ hyper-colonial academic climate and journalistic mediocrity?” This isn’t about expectation or even what “surprises” us, it’s about forced accountability and decolonizing Dutch media. And yes, it’s absolutely about putting a blowtorch to any conversation about Dutchness that fails to mention the country’s national levels of xenophobia, colonialism and/or racism.
Let us not be distracted and exhausted by white privilege driven liberals who slither towards our mentions or inboxes with lamentations of intentions, context or other philosophical derailings. The review is real, the illustration is real and both are problematic so let us have this conversation without those whose mere intention is to whitesplain this into nothingness. There’s no time to judge the arsonist by all the things he didn’t set on fire. We’re burning.
To join the conversation on social media, please use the hashtag #DecolonizeDutchMedia and consider adding Guus Valk, NRC and/or the newspaper’s literary blog.
#DecolonizeDutchMedia – Dutch newspaper urges Black America to stop blaming white people
Written by: Chandra Frank and Simone Zeefuik
Myths of the Netherlands as the home of tulips and tolerance should only exist in the minds of those who’re in the business of touristy promotions. In reality, this is the country of Eva “Nggbtch” Hoeke, Thierry Baudet who got his privilege ravaged and handed to him by the briljant Fatou Diome and Dutch sports commentators who, on national TV, wonder if Boko Haram would be part of Nigeria’s soccer team. It’s the home of white cartoonists who mock Black casualties of forced migration and white public figures who appear on talkshows to refer to African refugees as “blackies” or tell the presenter that he’s rather unlucky because he’s “not just Black… but also stupid!” This is the Netherlands, where on July 23 national newspaper NRC offered space to Charles Groenhuijsen’s column about the trials of the Black communities and the Black Lives Matters campaign founded by Opal Tometi, Alicia Garza and Patrisse Cullors (pic). The title: “Black America needs to look at itself.”
In his intro, Groenhuijsen argues that “Black poverty in the US comes forth out of racism, but you can’t blame white people for everything.” Groenhuijsen, a white Dutch journalist, writer and public speaker who’s based in Bethesda (USA), is the quintessential poster boy of his country’s distorted approach to Black people’s histories, the national sentiment that whiteness outweighs research or study and the subpar level of journalism all this produces. He continues: “Ask Americans what the biggest problem of the country is and they will start about the economy, unemployment and the role of the government. And since this Spring also racism. Not that racism was ever gone, but it wasn’t on top of the list. Because of deathly incidents where police officers killed black civilians (Ferguson, Staten Island, South-Charleston) racism is back on the front pages. It is a persistent problem. Contradictions between white and black are rather bigger than smaller. Also the first black president of the US does not bring improvement. Obama doesn’t realize the impossible. Which is not a reproach.”
The Dutch in any case, from their role in slavery to their grave abuse of the rights of illegalized refugees, demand nuance. Whenever racism is discussed in the Netherlands it is always in conjunction with nuance. Groenhuijsen has no intention to break his country’s code of whiteness: “Who in a discussion about racism insists on nuance can count on criticism. What is there to nuance about racism? I will try either way. Not to suggest it’s not that bad with discrimination in the US. It is bad. Large and small racism is there every day. At the office, at school, in shops, on street corners. It leads to an angry debate that gets stuck in the hopeless binary of right and wrong, victim and perpetrator. Too often it is about the consequences in the 21st century of slavery in the 18th and 19th century: a black-white dispute in which bitterness and pessimism prevail. Too many whites say: racism is about over. If a black American can conquer the White House, is everything possible. Stop complaining and demonstrating. Oh, and as well-meaning white person I don’t want to be blamed for something that happened two centuries ago.”
Groenhuijsen’s call for nuance is appalling. Not only is he telling Black Americans what to do in a Dutch newspaper, he suggests Black Americans play an equal part in the current racial affairs. He fails to ask why Black people are attacked and incarcerated daily, fails to ask how white people contribute and maintain the very white supremacist system that he calls nuanced racism. Where does he question how it is possible that Black people are arrested on non-existing grounds and die at the hands of the State? The problem with Groenhuijsen and the likes is that next to forever wanting nuance they also are firm believers of equality. After his ‘analysis’, he deems himself important enough to offer ‘solutions’ for America’s future. And of course, the answer lays in the idea that Black and white both need to let go of their prejudice and work together towards a ‘hopeful’ future. “Is there only bad news for black America? No, the good news is that more and more African Americans are successful. You can become professor, surgeon, director, top athlete, popstar, and indeed president. Unfortunately, the number of those who structurally stay behind remains too large. Too often Black Americans misused deprivation (as powerlessness, despair?) as something to be proud of. Who tries to do better is a show off: ‘You are acting so white’.”
As a good little white progressive, Groenhuijsen reminds us what his kinfolks are known for: discussing racism and discrimination by talking about how it affects white people. “In the meantime, discrimination against white people is very common. Just ask a random white pupil or student. Is it a form of bitterness?” This is the kind of mind that produces hashtags like #AllLivesMatter but limits calls for ‘inclusion’ to occasions when whiteness fears that its ‘other, better side’ is being ignored. Unable to see racism as an oppressive structure, white people like Groenhuijsen fail to graduate from the ‘Why don’t you like me? Why aren’t we talking about what this means for me?’-part of the conversation. To him and the vast majority of his countrymen, racism is the result of a lack of effort to overcome inequalities. Groenhuijsen references cops killing Black people, the link between poverty and racism, the existing figures on racism, and still argues whites will only change their attitudes if Black Americans change their behaviour. Groenhuijsen eagerly makes use of the widespread idea that Black humanity is dependent on white goodwill. He states: “[…] young black Americans: you don’t need to impregnate 16 year old girls because your grandmother sat in the back of the bus. You don’t need to shoot and kill fellow blacks because there was once slavery […] Of course black lives are of value. But why do Black Americans kill each other so often (more than 40 deaths a week)? When compared to whites, the number of African American killers is seven times as high. Doesn’t your battle cry count in those cases? Why isn’t there a black leader standing up to yell “Yes, all black lives matter” for every black murder victim? […] Obama is the best possible ally of black Amerika. But don’t expect a black president to solve just solve all problems for you.”
The aim of the translations we offer here is not to reproduce his racist and violent words, but to hold Groenhuijsen and Dutch media responsible and call them out on their racist propaganda. Dutch media needs to face their daily reproduction of whiteness plus answer for it on both a national and an international level. It is utter cowardice to write such bold, anti-Black statements about a movement but do so in a way in which the changes of a response are slim to none. Did Groenhuijsen approach any American media in an attempt to sell his Dutch views on the Black Lives Matter movement? If Groenhuijsen is serious, or at least sincere, about the advice he wants to offer Black America, why did he choose this rather inaccessible form? Could it be that, not quit unlike a growing group of white liberals/progressives/saviors/etc. Groenhuijsen thinks that conversations about Black people need to be had far away from the reality that we might respond and drag them for filth?
Please add #DecolonizeDutchMedia to your statements on social media and consider mentioning @nrcnext when you’re Tweeting about this article. We’re urging everybody to not click on any of the NRC links so they can’t turn this into some random click peak that will make them more interesting for sponsors and/or advertisers.
laZeefuik 
You must be logged in to post a comment.